Re: [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Lai.

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:05:32AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> @@ -4757,25 +4747,16 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
>  {
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>  	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
> -	struct worker_pool *pool;
> -	int pi;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
>  
>  	if (!workqueue_freezing)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
> -	/* clear FREEZING */
> -	for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING));
> -		pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING;
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -	}
> -
>  	/* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */
>  	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
>  		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> +		wq->flags &= ~__WQ_FREEZING;

I want an assertion here.  Maybe we can fold the next patch into this
one and add WARN_ON_ONCE() here?

>  		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
>  			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
>  		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/