Re: [PATCH 0/4] kprobes: split blacklist into common and arch

From: Vineet Gupta
Date: Thu Apr 04 2013 - 07:32:44 EST


Hi Oskar,

On 04/03/2013 01:58 PM, oskar.andero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a slight rework of the following patches which I posted earlier:
> [PATCH] Kprobes blacklist: Conditionally add x86-specific symbols
> [PATCH] delay blacklist symbol lookup until we actually need it
>
> This serie includes a patch that moves the architecture dependent black points
> to the arch/ directory and the x86 patch was modified to follow that patch.
>
> -Oskar
>
> BjÃrn Davidsson (1):
> kprobes: move x86-specific blacklist symbols to arch directory
>
> Oskar Andero (2):
> kprobes: split blacklist into common and arch
> kprobes: replace printk with pr_-functions
>
> Toby Collett (1):
> kprobes: delay blacklist symbol lookup until we actually need it
>
> arch/arc/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +
> arch/avr32/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/mips/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/mn10300/kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/sparc/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 7 ++
> kernel/kprobes.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 12 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>

For any arch changes, however trivial they might be, you need to CC the respective
maintainers, or atleast post the patches on linux-arch so we know what's going on !


Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/