Re: [PATCH 3/7] dump_stack: consolidate dump_stack()implementations and unify their behaviors

[Martin Schwidefsky]

On Wed,  3 Apr 2013 12:14:53 -0700
Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> v2: CPU number added to the generic debug info as requested by s390
>     folks and dropped the s390 specific dump_stack().  This loses %ksp
>     from the debug message which the maintainers think isn't important
>     enough to keep the s390-specific dump_stack() implementation.
> 
>     dump_stack_print_info() is moved to kernel/printk.c from
>     lib/dump_stack.c.  Because linkage is per objecct file,
>     dump_stack_print_info() living in the same lib file as generic
>     dump_stack() means that archs which implement custom dump_stack()
>     - at this point, only blackfin - can't use dump_stack_print_info()
>     as that will bring in the generic version of dump_stack() too.  v1
>     The v1 patch broke build on blackfin due to this issue.  The build
>     breakage was reported by Fengguang Wu.

For the s390 changes:
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/