Re: [PATCH 1/4] kprobes: delay blacklist symbol lookup until we actuallyneed it

[Masami Hiramatsu]

(2013/04/03 17:28), oskar.andero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>  
> +/* it can take some time ( > 100ms ) to initialise the
> + * blacklist so we delay this until we actually need it
> + */
> +static void init_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	unsigned long offset = 0, size = 0;
> +	char *modname, namebuf[128];
> +	const char *symbol_name;
> +	void *addr;
> +	struct kprobe_blackpoint *kb;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Lookup and populate the kprobe_blacklist.
> +	 *
> +	 * Unlike the kretprobe blacklist, we'll need to determine
> +	 * the range of addresses that belong to the said functions,
> +	 * since a kprobe need not necessarily be at the beginning
> +	 * of a function.
> +	 */
> +	for (kb = kprobe_blacklist; kb->name != NULL; kb++) {
> +		kprobe_lookup_name(kb->name, addr);
> +		if (!addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		kb->start_addr = (unsigned long)addr;
> +		symbol_name = kallsyms_lookup(kb->start_addr,
> +				&size, &offset, &modname, namebuf);
> +		if (!symbol_name)
> +			kb->range = 0;
> +		else
> +			kb->range = size;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (kretprobe_blacklist_size) {
> +		/* lookup the function address from its name */
> +		for (i = 0; kretprobe_blacklist[i].name != NULL; i++) {
> +			kprobe_lookup_name(kretprobe_blacklist[i].name,
> +					   kretprobe_blacklist[i].addr);
> +			if (!kretprobe_blacklist[i].addr)
> +				printk("kretprobe: lookup failed: %s\n",
> +				       kretprobe_blacklist[i].name);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	kprobe_blacklist_initialized = 1;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
>  /*
>   * kprobe->ainsn.insn points to the copy of the instruction to be
> @@ -1331,6 +1379,9 @@ static int __kprobes in_kprobes_functions(unsigned long addr)
>  	if (addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
>  	    addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!kprobe_blacklist_initialized)
> +		init_kprobe_blacklist();
>  	/*
>  	 * If there exists a kprobe_blacklist, verify and
>  	 * fail any probe registration in the prohibited area
> @@ -1816,6 +1867,8 @@ int __kprobes register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
>  	void *addr;
>  
>  	if (kretprobe_blacklist_size) {
> +		if (!kprobe_blacklist_initialized)
> +			init_kprobe_blacklist();

Joonsoo reminds me that these calling points are not protected by kprobe_mutex,
thus we have to do something for avoiding concurrent initialization.

Perhaps, the easiest way is to protect init_kprobe_blacklist() by kprobe_mutex
and check kprobe_blacklist_initialized again in the top of that.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/