Re: [PATCH/Resend 2/2] arm: mach-omap2: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend"

[Kevin Hilman]

Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
> On Wednesday 20 March 2013 05:36 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>> Realised the list  to whom the patch was send got dropped. Ccing
>> them all..
>> On Wednesday 20 March 2013 05:18 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>> On Tuesday 19 March 2013 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>> Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@xxxxxx>  writes:
>>>>
>>>>> With dt boot, uart wakeup after suspend is non functional on
>>>>> omap4/5 while using
>>>>> "no_console_suspend" in the bootargs. With "no_console_suspend"
>>>>> used, od->flags
>>>>> should be ORed with "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND", thereby not
>>>>> allowing the console
>>>>> to idle in the suspend path. For non-dt case, this was taken care
>>>>> by platform data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on omap5430evm, omap4430sdp.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi<balbi@xxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: Rajendra nayak<rnayak@xxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar<sourav.poddar@xxxxxx>
>>>> This patch creates a dependency between omap_device (generic,
>>>> device-independent code) and a specific driver (UART.)
>>>>
>>>> If you need to do something like this that's DT boot specific, then
>>>> we probably need some late initcall in serial.c to handle this.
>>>> It does
>>>> not belong in omap_device.
>>>>
>>> The following function "omap_device_disable_idle_on_suspend(pdev)"
>>> should only
>>> be called once the omap device has been build, which in the case of
>>> device tree is
>>> done in omap_device.c file. Moreover, the above call should be
>>> executed conditionally
>>> and should depend on the following two parameter.
>>>
>>> [1]  a. Whether "no_console_suspend" is set and
>>>      b.  the device build is a console uart.
>>>
>>> When I look closely into the serial.c file, I realised that
>>> "core_initcall(omap_serial_early_init)" gets called irrespective
>>> of dt/non dt boot and will take care of most of the stuff(checking
>>> whether
>>> "no_console_suspend" is used and which uart is used as a console
>>> uart) which the
>>> $subject patch is proposing.
>>>
>>> But the problem is that we need to exchange the parsed information
>>> from serial.c to the omap_device file for the condtional execution of
>>> "omap_device_disable_idle_on_suspend"
>>>
>>> In this case,
>>> from "serial.c" we need
>>>     1. no_console_suspend = true
>>>     2. strcpy(console_name, oh_name), where oh_name corresponds to
>>> the console uart.
>>>
>>> then in "omap_device.c" do
>>>     if (no_console_suspend && !strcmp(oh->name, console_name))
>>>                 omap_device_disable_idle_on_suspend(pdev);
>>>
>>> Please correct if I am understanding it incorrectly.
>>>
>>> If the above understanding looks good to you, is there a way we can
>>> make this
>>> exchange of information happen between serial.c and omap_device.c file?
> Any input on this?
> As I explained earlier, that there is a need to parse information in
> serial.c and use that in
> omap_device.c only after the device is build.

As I explained earlier, any device specific hacks inside omap_device
should be a red flag that something has gone wrong.

How about fixing the UART driver/core to not runtime suspend if
no_console_suspend is given?  

Then we can get rid of this no_idle_on_suspend hack all together since
UART is the only remaining user.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/