Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out

From: Eric Whitney
Date: Wed Apr 03 2013 - 10:34:18 EST


* Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:22:04PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out
> >
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > When an extent was zeroed out, we forgot to do convert from cpu to le16.
> > It could make us hit a BUG_ON when we try to write dirty pages out. So
> > fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for finding this! I think we should push this to Linus right
> away, and not wait for the next merge window. The bug has been here
> for a long time, but it was unmasked by the fact that we unbroke
> extent zeroing in 3.9-rcX.
>
> I have two big questions. (1) Shouldn't Eric Whitney have picked this
> up with his ARM pandaboard testing, since IIRC it's big-endian as
> well? If not, is there something we can do to improve our testing wrt
> to big-endian systems?


The TI OMAP4 processor on my Pandaboard test system is little endian.

Eric


>
> And (2) does it make sense to have an inline function
> ext4_ext_set_len(len)? It might save some lines of code, but more
> importantly, it might make it less likely that we will overlook this
> sort of bug in the future.
>
> - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/