Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, kdump: Retore crashkernel= to allocate low

[Yinghai Lu]

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:49:13AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > aka:
>> > old kexec-tools stay with "crashkernel=X"
>> > new kexec-tools stay with
>> > 1. like old kexec tools
>> > 2. or "crashkernel=X,high" or "crashkernel=X,high crashkernel=Y,low",
>> > Y could be 100M or 0 etc.
>>
>> I keep the old logic like:
>> if there are several "crashkernel=X,high", only last one is honored.
>> if there are several "crashkernel=Y,low", only last one is honored.
>
> Yes but if different types of crashkernel= options are mixes then
> behavior is not defined.

dmesg or /proc/iomem will show them what is finally reserved.

>
> crashkernel=X,high crashkernel=X

==> crashkernel=X is tossed away.

> crashkernel=X,high crashkernel=Y;low

normal case. if user want more or disable low range.

> crashkernel=Y;low crashkernel=X

crashkernel=X will be used.

>
> And possibilities go on. So I think it makes life simpler if we always
> parse last crashkernel= option and act upon that. And use
> crashkernel_no_auto_low to opt out of auto reserved low memory area.

No, that is not just disable. User could want more like 128M instead of 72M.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/