Re: [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance

[Michael Wang]

On 04/02/2013 04:35 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 03:23 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> The reason may caused by wake_affine()'s higher overhead, and pgbench is
>> really sensitive to this stuff...
> 
> Thanks for testing. Could you like to remove the last patch and test it
> again? I want to know if the last patch has effect on pgbench.

Amazing, without the last one, pgbench show very good improvement,
higher than 10ms throttle, lower than 100ms throttle, I need confirm
this with a night-through testing.

I will look into those patches in detail later, I think it addressed
part of the wake_affine() issue (make the decision more accurately),
that's nice ;-)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/