Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 runningxfstests case #78]

[CAI Qian]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "CAI Qian" <caiqian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 5:00:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78]
> 
> On Tue, Apr 02 2013, CAI Qian wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "CAI Qian" <caiqian@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "LKML"
> > > <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 3:30:35 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5
> > > running xfstests case #78]
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > > [Added jens Axboe to CC]
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:08:49AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
> > > > > > Saw on almost all the servers range from x64, ppc64 and s390x with
> > > > > > kernel
> > > > > > 3.9-rc5 and xfsprogs-3.1.10. Never caught this in 3.9-rc4, so looks
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > something new broke this. Log is here with sysrq debug info.
> > > > > > http://people.redhat.com/qcai/stable/log
> > > > 
> > > > CAI Qian, can you try and back the below out and test again?
> > > 
> > > Nevermind, it's clearly that one. The below should improve the
> > > situation, but it's not pretty. A better fix would be to allow
> > > auto-deletion even if PART_NO_SCAN is set.
> > Jens, when compiled the mainline (up to fefcdbe) with this patch,
> > it error-ed out,
> 
> Looks like I sent the wrong one, updated below.
The patch works well. Thanks!
CAI Qian
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index fe5f640..faa3afa 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1057,14 +1057,15 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  		struct disk_part_iter piter;
>  		struct hd_struct *part;
>  
> -		mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, 1);
> -		invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
> -		disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk,
> -					DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
> -		while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
> -			delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
> -		disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
> -		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> +		if (mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex)) {
> +			invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
> +			disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk,
> +						DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
> +			while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
> +				delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
> +			disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
> +			mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> 
> --
> Jens Axboe
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/