Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] cpufreq: split the cpufreq_driver_lock and use the rcu

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Apr 02 2013 - 01:05:51 EST


On 2 April 2013 01:41, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c

> +static struct cpufreq_driver __rcu *cpufreq_driver;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);

You really need this lock? This is only used in cpufreq_register_driver
and unregister_driver... And it doesn't protect other routines at all. And
because we are using rcu stuff now, probably this lock is just not required.

> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpufreq_data_lock);

Only this one is required and it can be the rwlock which is already pushed
by rafael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/