Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()

[Joonsoo Kim]

Hello, Peter.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 16:58 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > There is not enough reason to place this checking at
> > update_sg_lb_stats(),
> > except saving one iteration for sched_group_cpus. But with this
> > change,
> > we can save two memset cost and can expect better compiler
> > optimization,
> > so clean-up may be more beneficial to us.
> 
> It would be good if you'd described what you actually did, there's a
> lot of code movement and now I have to figure out wth you did and why.

Okay. I will do that when respin.

Thanks.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/