Re: [PATCHv2, RFC 07/30] thp, mm: introducemapping_can_have_hugepages() predicate

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Fri Mar 22 2013 - 06:10:32 EST


Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space *m)
> > +{
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m);
> > + return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> I did a quick search in all your patches and don't see __GFP_COMP
> getting _set_ anywhere. Am I missing something?

__GFP_COMP is part of GFP_TRANSHUGE. We set it for ramfs in patch 20/30.

--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/