Re: [PATCH] ARM: convert arm/arm64 arch timer to use CLKSRC_OF init

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Thu Mar 21 2013 - 07:06:58 EST


Hi Rob,

(adding Marc to Cc as he may have comments).

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:34:35PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This converts arm and arm64 to use CLKSRC_OF DT based initialization for
> the arch timer. A new function arch_timer_arch_init is added to allow for
> arch specific setup.
>
> This has a side effect of enabling sched_clock on omap5 and exynos5. There
> should not be any reason not to use the arch timers for sched_clock.

Nice! I was just about to post a (slightly updated) version of Thomas Abraham's
arch_timer clocksource_of_init patch, but this seems much more comprehensive.

I have some other arch_timer patches which may clash, but they could be rebased
atop of this.

>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> This is dependent on my CLKSRC_OF clean-up in arm-soc, my 64-bit sched_clock
> support series, and Arnd's default machine descriptor patch (for default
> clocksource_of_init call). This is only compile tested on arm.
>
> The full series (including sp804 work) is available here:
> git://sources.calxeda.com/kernel/linux.git arm-timers
>
> Rob
>

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
> index d0ad789..6215717 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * Versatile Express V2M Motherboard Support
> */
> +#include <linux/clocksource.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
> #include <linux/amba/mmci.h>
> @@ -23,7 +24,6 @@
> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> #include <linux/vexpress.h>
>
> -#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> #include <asm/sizes.h>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> @@ -446,10 +446,7 @@ static void __init v2m_dt_timer_init(void)
> irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0));
> }
>
> - arch_timer_of_register();
> -
> - if (arch_timer_sched_clock_init() != 0)
> - versatile_sched_clock_init(vexpress_get_24mhz_clock_base(),
> + versatile_sched_clock_init(vexpress_get_24mhz_clock_base(),
> 24000000);
> }
>

On TC2 this series leads to using the vexpress 24MHz clock as the sched clock
in preference to the architected timer:

Architected local timer running at 24.00MHz (virt).
Switching to timer-based delay loop
Registered arch_counter_get_cntvct+0x0/0x14 as sched_clock source
sched_clock: 32 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 178956ms
Registered versatile_read_sched_clock+0x0/0x28 as sched_clock source

As they both have the same frequency, neither overrides the other, and
whichever gets registered last is used as the sched_clock. As accesses to the
architected timer are going to have a much lower overhead, this isn't very nice
(and it could be better to use it even if it had a lower frequency).

We could move the versatile_sched_clock_init call before the
clocksource_of_init, but that doesn't feel like an ideal solution. We may have
similar problems elsewhere.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> index b0ef18d..a551f88 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/timer.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/clocksource.h>
>
> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
>
> @@ -77,10 +78,11 @@ void __init time_init(void)
> {
> u32 arch_timer_rate;
>
> - if (arch_timer_init())
> - panic("Unable to initialise architected timer.\n");
> + clocksource_of_init();
>
> arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_rate();
> + if (!arch_timer_rate)
> + panic("Unable to initialise architected timer.\n");
>
> /* Cache the sched_clock multiplier to save a divide in the hot path. */
> sched_clock_mult = NSEC_PER_SEC / arch_timer_rate;
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> index e507ab7..d98e7e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ config CLKSRC_DBX500_PRCMU_SCHED_CLOCK
>
> config ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> bool
> + select CLKSRC_OF if OF
>
> config CLKSRC_METAG_GENERIC
> def_bool y if METAG

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index d7ad425..afb70aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -337,24 +337,11 @@ out:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_of_match[] __initconst = {
> - { .compatible = "arm,armv7-timer", },
> - { .compatible = "arm,armv8-timer", },
> - {},
> -};
> -
> -int __init arch_timer_init(void)
> +static void __init arch_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
> {
> - struct device_node *np;
> u32 freq;
> int i;
>

If we the following here:

if (arch_timer_get_rate()) {
pr_warn("arch_timer: multiple nodes in dt, skipping\n");
return;
}

We may save ourselves a whole world of pain with dts which (erroneously) have
multiple timer nodes (though these are now disappearing). Otherwise we could
have a memory leak and multiple instances of the cpu0 timer registered, which
could lead to all sorts of weirdness. The existing code side-steps this issue
by only grabbing the first node, so this would keep things consistent.

> - np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match);
> - if (!np) {
> - pr_err("arch_timer: can't find DT node\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> /* Try to determine the frequency from the device tree or CNTFRQ */
> if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &freq))
> arch_timer_rate = freq;

[...]

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/