Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end of ELF note buffer

[Eric W. Biederman]

HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end of ELF note buffer
> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:11:51 -0700
>
>> HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> Modern kernel marks the end of ELF note buffer with NT_VMCORE_PAD type
>>> note in order to make the buffer satisfy mmap()'s page-size boundary
>>> requirement. This patch makes finishing reading each buffer if the
>>> note type now being read is NT_VMCORE_PAD type.
>> 
>> Ick.  Even with a pad header you can mark the end with an empty header,
>> and my memory may be deceiving me but I believe an empty header is
>> specified by the ELF ABI docs.
>> 
>> Beyond which I don't quite see the point of any of this as all of these
>> headers need to be combined into a single note section before being
>> presented to user space.
>
> Though this patch might get unecessary later, I cannot find part
> explaining necessity of marking end of ELF segmetns with an empty
> header in ELF spec. For example:

You are right.  It appears to be our own invention and just part of
the ABI of taking a crash dump.  Something we should sit down and
document someday.

> Also, it's possible to get size of a whole part of ELF note segments
> from p_memsz or p_filesz, and gdb and binutils are reading the note
> segments until reaching the size.

Agreed.  Except in our weird case where we generate the notes on the
fly, and generate the NOTE segment header much earlier.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/