Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (vmcore)

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi,

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> > I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly.  
> > The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is 
> > meaningless.
> > 
> > This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end 
> > of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree.  I've added the patch's 
> > author and Andrew to the cc.
> > 
> > How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC?
> 
> These patches were removed from -mm today so it should no longer be a 
> problem.

What exactly are "these patches" so that I can remove them from my copy
of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released
in the next hour or so).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature