Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: add input supply names

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Wed Mar 20 2013 - 12:42:34 EST

On 03/20/2013 10:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:07:17AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/20/2013 06:54 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> I generally send a patches on single git-send command git
>>> send-emal --to=ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx 0000.patch 0001.patch
>> Don't do that; send *.patch. If you don't, then patches 2..n
>> don't end up being "in-reply-to" patch 1, so they won't show up
>> as a single email thread.
> The two should be equivalent (though the glob is much easier to
> type)? The result of the globbing ought to be what Laxman is typing
> by hand assuming that he's getting the order correct.

If you send *.patch at once, git send-email adds an in-reply-to header
to the email which sets up the threading. If you send the patches
1-by-1, this header isn't added, since git send-email doesn't have a
clue what message ID it chose for patch 1. Unless you pass the
--in-reply-to command-line option, that is.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at