Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: remove /proc/device-tree
From: Daniel Mack
Date: Wed Mar 20 2013 - 12:25:01 EST
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 09:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> The same data is now available in sysfs, so we can remove the code
>> that exports it in /proc and replace it with a symlink to the sysfs
>> Tested on versatile qemu model and mpc5200 eval board. More testing
>> would be appreciated.
> I would suggest testing with lshw in particular. That's the only
> /proc/device-tree user I've come across.
kexec is another one. Not to mention various vendor scripts that aren't
Don't such things also fall under the "we do not break userspace
compatibility - ever" rule?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/