[no subject]

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Mar 19 2013 - 16:55:42 EST


699ce097efe ("workqueue: implement and use pwq_adjust_max_active()")
replaced the only workqueue_freezing usage outside freezer callbacks
with a POOL_FREEZING test. This makes workqueue_freezing unused when
!CONFIG_FREEZER leading to a compiler warning. Define
workqueue_freezing iff CONFIG_FREEZER.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e38d035..775c2f4 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -261,7 +261,9 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pwq_lock); /* protects pool_workqueues */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */

static LIST_HEAD(workqueues); /* WQ: list of all workqueues */
+#ifdef CONFIG_FREEZER
static bool workqueue_freezing; /* WQ: have wqs started freezing? */
+#endif

/* the per-cpu worker pools */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct worker_pool [NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS],
--
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/