[PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simplify workqueue_cpu_up_callback(CPU_ONLINE)

From: Lai Jiangshan
Date: Tue Mar 19 2013 - 15:29:55 EST


If we have 4096 CPUs, workqueue_cpu_up_callback() will travel too much CPUs,
to avoid it, we use for_each_cpu_worker_pool for the cpu pools and
use unbound_pool_hash for unbound pools.

After it, for_each_pool() becomes unused, so we remove it.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 29c5baa..21ef721 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -317,23 +317,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
(pool)++)

/**
- * for_each_pool - iterate through all worker_pools in the system
- * @pool: iteration cursor
- * @pi: integer used for iteration
- *
- * This must be called either with pools_mutex held or sched RCU read locked.
- * If the pool needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
- * responsible for guaranteeing that the pool stays online.
- *
- * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
- * ignored.
- */
-#define for_each_pool(pool, pi) \
- idr_for_each_entry(&worker_pool_idr, pool, pi) \
- if (({ assert_rcu_or_pools_mutex(); false; })) { } \
- else
-
-/**
* for_each_pool_worker - iterate through all workers of a worker_pool
* @worker: iteration cursor
* @wi: integer used for iteration
@@ -4011,7 +3994,7 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
struct worker *worker;
int wi;

- lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);

/*
* Restore CPU affinity of all workers. As all idle workers should
@@ -4023,7 +4006,7 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0))
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;

spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);

@@ -4064,6 +4047,9 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)

pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
}

/**
@@ -4078,25 +4064,28 @@ static void associate_cpu_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
*/
static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
{
- static cpumask_t cpumask;
+ static cpumask_t cpumask; /* protected by pools_mutex */
struct worker *worker;
int wi;

- lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);

/* is @cpu allowed for @pool? */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, pool->attrs->cpumask))
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;

/* is @cpu the only online CPU? */
cpumask_and(&cpumask, pool->attrs->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
if (cpumask_weight(&cpumask) != 1)
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;

/* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */
for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
}

/*
@@ -4109,7 +4098,7 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
{
int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
struct worker_pool *pool;
- int pi;
+ int bkt;

switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
@@ -4123,20 +4112,12 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,

case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
case CPU_ONLINE:
- mutex_lock(&pools_mutex);
-
- for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
- mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
-
- if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
- associate_cpu_pool(pool);
- } else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
- restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
- }
-
- mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
- }
+ for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
+ associate_cpu_pool(pool);

+ mutex_lock(&pools_mutex);
+ hash_for_each(unbound_pool_hash, bkt, pool, hash_node)
+ restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
mutex_unlock(&pools_mutex);
break;
}
--
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/