[PATCH 04/21] workqueue: swap the two branches in pwq_adjust_max_active() to get better readability

[Lai Jiangshan]

"if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING))" is hard to read.

Swap the two branches. it becomes
"if (freezable && (pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING))", it is better.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e1b31fc..8c882ae 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3592,14 +3592,14 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 
 	spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
 
-	if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) {
+	if (freezable && (pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) {
+		pwq->max_active = 0;
+	} else {
 		pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
 
 		while (!list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works) &&
 		       pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)
 			pwq_activate_first_delayed(pwq);
-	} else {
-		pwq->max_active = 0;
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock);
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/