Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Add a test case for checking sw clockevent frequency

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:41:47AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> +static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id)
> +{
> +	int i, err = -1;
> +	volatile int tmp = 0;
> +	u64 total_periods = 0;
> +	int nr_samples = 0;
> +	union perf_event *event;
> +	struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> +	struct perf_evlist *evlist;
> +	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> +		.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
> +		.config = clock_id,
> +		.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD,
> +		.exclude_kernel = 1,
> +		.disabled = 1,
> +		.freq = 1,
> +		.sample_freq = 10000,
> +	};

In some compilers we get:

tests/sw-clock.c: In function â__test__sw_clock_freqâ:
tests/sw-clock.c:35: error: unknown field âsample_freqâ specified in initializer

So I'm moving the initialization to outside the struct named initialization block, i.e.:

@@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id)
                .exclude_kernel = 1,
                .disabled = 1,
                .freq = 1,
-               .sample_freq = 10000,
        };
 
+       attr.sample_freq = 10000;
+

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/