Re: [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt

From: Jaehoon Chung
Date: Wed Mar 13 2013 - 04:31:49 EST


Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On 03/12/2013 07:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> There is no reason to loop when handling an interrupt. The "if" clauses
> will handle all of them sequentially. This also eliminates the extra loop
> we used to take with no pending interrupts and we ended up breaking out
> of the while loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The patch is based on Chris Ball's mmc-next branch
>
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 60063cc..78c7251 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1563,11 +1563,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct dw_mci *host = dev_id;
> u32 pending;
> - unsigned int pass_count = 0;
> int i;
>
> - do {
> - pending = mci_readl(host, MINTSTS); /* read-only mask reg */
> + pending = mci_readl(host, MINTSTS); /* read-only mask reg */
> +
> + if (pending) {
>
> /*
> * DTO fix - version 2.10a and below, and only if internal DMA
> @@ -1579,9 +1579,6 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> pending |= SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER;
> }
>
> - if (!pending)
> - break;
> -
> if (pending & DW_MCI_CMD_ERROR_FLAGS) {
> mci_writel(host, RINTSTS, DW_MCI_CMD_ERROR_FLAGS);
> host->cmd_status = pending;
> @@ -1642,7 +1639,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
> }
>
> - } while (pass_count++ < 5);
> + }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC
> /* Handle DMA interrupts */
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/