Re: [PATCH 3/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Use an inlinefunction to evaluate freq_target

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Mar 06 2013 - 10:58:32 EST


On 6 March 2013 22:15, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target to avoid duplicate code.
>
> Also, define a macro for the default frequency step.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index 08be431..3fb921d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> /* Conservative governor macros */
> #define DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (80)
> #define DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD (20)
> +#define DEF_FREQUENCY_STEP (5)
> #define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (1)
> #define MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (10)
>
> @@ -39,9 +40,20 @@ static struct cs_dbs_tuners cs_tuners = {
> .down_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD,
> .sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR,
> .ignore_nice = 0,
> - .freq_step = 5,
> + .freq_step = DEF_FREQUENCY_STEP,
> };
>
> +static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + unsigned int freq_target = (cs_tuners.freq_step * policy->max) / 100;
> +
> + /* max freq cannot be less than 100. But who knows... */
> + if (unlikely(freq_target == 0))
> + freq_target = DEF_FREQUENCY_STEP;
> +
> + return freq_target;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Every sampling_rate, we check, if current idle time is less than 20%
> * (default), then we try to increase frequency. Every sampling_rate *
> @@ -55,7 +67,6 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
> {
> struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.cur_policy;
> - unsigned int freq_target;
>
> /*
> * break out if we 'cannot' reduce the speed as the user might
> @@ -72,13 +83,7 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq == policy->max)
> return;
>
> - freq_target = (cs_tuners.freq_step * policy->max) / 100;
> -
> - /* max freq cannot be less than 100. But who knows.... */
> - if (unlikely(freq_target == 0))
> - freq_target = 5;
> -
> - dbs_info->requested_freq += freq_target;
> + dbs_info->requested_freq += get_freq_target(policy);
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq > policy->max)
> dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->max;
>
> @@ -94,9 +99,7 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
>
> /* Check for frequency decrease */
> if (load < cs_tuners.down_threshold) {
> - freq_target = (cs_tuners.freq_step * policy->max) / 100;
> -
> - dbs_info->requested_freq -= freq_target;
> + dbs_info->requested_freq -= get_freq_target(policy);
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq < policy->min)
> dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->min;
>
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/