Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] leds: leds-pwm: Defer led_pwm_set() if PWM cansleep

[Florian Vaussard]

On 03/04/2013 11:58 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> > Hi Bryan, Richard,
> >
> > > On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> > > > > Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
> > > > > If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c |   50
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > >   1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to
> > > > my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you took
> > > > through your tree and Florian based his patches on top of that. The
> > > > conflict resolution should be trivial, though.
> > >
> > > It seems that this patch was not taken. Could you pull it, as the other
> > > part is already in linux-pwm? Or is there any show stopper?
> >
> > Ping? Who should merge this?
>
> I assume Bryan will take it through the LED tree? Patches 1 & 2 went
> into v3.9-rc1 through the PWM tree.

This was also my assumption, but I never got the feedback from Brian on 
this patch.
The crach is still there, and the patch missed the merge window :)

Cheers,

Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/