Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: Get rid of CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC again

From: Paul Bolle
Date: Tue Mar 05 2013 - 08:06:47 EST


On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:55 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 13:20, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> > index d9c8284..b40f37f 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> > @@ -28,11 +28,7 @@
> > /* #define cpu_has_prefetch ? */
> > #define cpu_has_mcheck 1
> > /* #define cpu_has_ejtag ? */
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC
> > -#define cpu_has_llsc 1
> > -#else
> > #define cpu_has_llsc 0
> > -#endif
>
> Hm, shouldn't you leave cpu_has_llsc set to 1? At least the "old" path
> SEAD3 => CPU_MIPS32_R1/R2/64_R1 => select CPU_HAS_LLSC for all three
> would have always caused this to be 1.

That would mean an actual change to the code. See, there's no Kconfig
symbol CPU_HAS_LLSC since v2.6.32. This means that CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC
has not been defined ever since and that SEAD3 has been having
cpu_has_llsc set to 0 for some time now. My patch just removes dead
code.

Perhaps SEAD3 need cpu_has_llsc set to 1. I wouldn't know. Anyhow, that
should be done in another patch, with (runtime) testing, etc.


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/