RE: [PATCH] usb: host: tegra: Reset Tegra USB controller before init

From: Venu Byravarasu
Date: Mon Mar 04 2013 - 02:55:27 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:47 PM
> To: Venu Byravarasu
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: tegra: Reset Tegra USB controller before init
>
> On 02/27/2013 11:36 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> > To clear any configurations made by U-Boot on Tegra USB controller,
> > reset it before init in probe.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
>
> > @@ -691,6 +692,10 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > if (err)
> > goto fail_clk;
> >
> > + tegra_periph_reset_assert(tegra->clk);
> > + udelay(1);
> > + tegra_periph_reset_deassert(tegra->clk);
>
> I think this patch might cause unintended consequences.
>
> When the Tegra PHY code is converted to a driver (i.e. has its own
> probe), the initial order of execution of the PHY and EHCI driver probes
> will not be guaranteed.
>
> In particular, since the EHCI probe will attempt to "find" the PHY
> device, and defer the EHCI probe until it can do so, this guarantees
> that the PHY's probe() will have completed before EHCI's probe()
> completes (although EHCI's probe may start running first some number of
> times, and be retried with -EPROBE_DEFERRED for a variety of reasons).
>
> Now, if the PHY driver's probe() actually touches HW and sets up some
> registers, isn't this reset call going to trash any of that register
> setup? Or, will PHY probe() not touch registers, but only do so during
> the standard PHY open/init "op"/API calls?

Yes, PHY driver probe does not touch any registers. It just sets up the PHY API hooks.
These APIs will be called from ehci-tegra.c as part of ehci tegra probe function, after
getting PHY handle, which in turn happens after issuing above reset.

Thanks to Stephen & Alan, for the review comments.

>
> I think the way to solve this is to put the reset call into the PHY
> driver. I assume it has access to the appropriate clock object.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/