Re: [PATCH 3/5] f2fs: move f2fs_balance_fs to correct place in unlink

From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Sat Mar 02 2013 - 23:35:14 EST


2013-03-02 (í), 12:41 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Actual dirty of pages will occur in f2fs_delete_entry so move the
> f2fs_balance_fs just before deletion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> index 1a49b88..eaa86f5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> @@ -223,8 +223,6 @@ static int f2fs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> struct page *page;
> int err = -ENOENT;
>
> - f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
> de = f2fs_find_entry(dir, &dentry->d_name, &page);
> if (!de)
> goto fail;
> @@ -236,6 +234,8 @@ static int f2fs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> goto fail;
> }
>
> + f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +

I think we don't need to do this because of no issues on performance and
reliability.
In addition, it would be better to call f2fs_balance_fs without any
dentry page.

> f2fs_delete_entry(de, page, inode);
>
> /* In order to evict this inode, we set it dirty */

--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part