Re: [GIT PULL] late arch/metag fixes for v3.9-rc1

[Borislav Petkov]

On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:28:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:22 AM, James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I've rebased the arch/metag tree onto mainline to make all the
> > back-merges unnecessary and applied those simple fixes into "Build
> > infrastructure" and "Various other headers" commits (additionally
> > trivially removing ARCH_NO_VIRT_TO_BUS which is also now unnecessary).
> 
> No, this is *exactly* the wrong thing to do.

<snip good practices and musings about maintainer trees>

Hmm, so this comes up almost everytime new maintainers send stuff (and
when seasoned maintainers forget :)), maybe we should hold it down
somewhere in Documentation/ for future reference?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/