[ 31/46] fuse: dont WARN when nlink is zero

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>

commit dfca7cebc2679f3d129f8e680a8f199a7ad16e38 upstream.

drop_nlink() warns if nlink is already zero.  This is triggerable by a buggy
userspace filesystem.  The cure, I think, is worse than the disease so disable
the warning.

Reported-by: Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/fuse/dir.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -645,7 +645,14 @@ static int fuse_unlink(struct inode *dir
 
 		spin_lock(&fc->lock);
 		fi->attr_version = ++fc->attr_version;
-		drop_nlink(inode);
+		/*
+		 * If i_nlink == 0 then unlink doesn't make sense, yet this can
+		 * happen if userspace filesystem is careless.  It would be
+		 * difficult to enforce correct nlink usage so just ignore this
+		 * condition here
+		 */
+		if (inode->i_nlink > 0)
+			drop_nlink(inode);
 		spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
 		fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
 		fuse_invalidate_attr(dir);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/