Re: + mm-show_mem-suppress-page-counts-in-non-blockable-contexts.patchadded to -mm tree

From: David Rientjes
Date: Fri Mar 01 2013 - 05:15:17 EST


On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:

> I have already asked about it in the original thread but didn't get any
> answer. How can we get a soft lockup when all implementations of show_mem
> call touch_nmi_watchdog?
>

Feel free to do s/soft lockups/irqs being disabled for an extremely long
time/.

> I do agree with the change but the above justification seems misleading.
> Can we just remove the information because it is costly and doesn't give
> us anything relevant to debug allocation failures?
>

I believe I have already said yes, that all pertinent information is
already there and I do not believe this additional information
continuously spewed to the kernel log is helpful in debugging VM issues or
understanding why the oom condition exists.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/