Re: For review: pid_namespaces(7) man page

[Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)]

[CC += Lennart]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Vasily Kulikov <segoon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>    The namespace init process
>>        The first process created in a new namespace (i.e., the process
>>        created using clone(2) with the CLONE_NEWPID flag, or the first
>>        child created by a process after a call to unshare(2) using the
>>        CLONE_NEWPID flag) has the PID 1, and is the "init" process for
>>        the namespace (see init(1)).  Children that are orphaned within
>>        the namespace will be reparented to this  process  rather  than
>>        init(1).
>
> Probably it worth noting here that this is true unless
> prctl() with PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER option is called.

Thanks Vasily. It probably is worth mentioning that, and I will add some words.

One thing I am not sure of (have not tested), but maybe you (or Eric)
know the answer: does the effect of PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER  cross a
PID namespace boundary? In other words, if it was a process in the
parent PID namespace that employed PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER , will that
affect child processes in a child PID namespace, or  wiill
PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER  only apply to child processes in the same PID
namespace as the caller?

Thanks,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface"; http://man7.org/tlpi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/