Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches

From: Joonsoo Kim
Date: Mon Feb 25 2013 - 00:15:52 EST

Hello, Christoph.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:35:22AM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> > With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to
> > deactivate objects.
> > If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine
> > which has no overhead.
> Well this occurs during boot and its not that performance critical.

Yes, this is not performance critical place, but why do we use
a sub-optimal solution?

And flushing is abstration for complicated logic, so I think that
my raw implemntation is better for understanding.

But, I have no objection to merge Glauber's one
if you think that is better.


> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> see: .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at