Re: [PATCH 11/40] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Bootloader addresses formXT1664/mXT1188S

From: Nick Dyer
Date: Fri Feb 22 2013 - 14:51:38 EST

Benson Leung wrote:
> This is disappointing that Atmel decided to change the bootloader
> address scheme for the 1664S family. Unfortunately, this ifdef won't
> work for situations where there are more than one Atmel device of a
> different kind on a system using this same driver.
> For the Chromebook Pixel, we use the same atmel_mxt_ts driver for a
> 1664S device and a 224SL.
> The 1664S has the pair 0x26 and 0x4a, while the 224SL has 0x25 and
> 0x4b.

If I put a bootloader address override in the platform data will that meet
your requirements?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at