Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Feb 22 2013 - 09:09:31 EST
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Argh!! at what cost? 64bit atomics are like expensive. Wouldn't
> > a seqlock be saner?
> Not sure. This requires a spinlock in the write side which is called
> fast path like the timer interrupt.
A single spinlock is _way_ cheaper than a ton of cmpxchg8b()s to update
a few variables.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/