Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: add policy support for file system uuid

From: David Rientjes
Date: Thu Feb 21 2013 - 16:54:17 EST


On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 4adcd0f..23f49e3 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/magic.h>
> #include <linux/parser.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/genhd.h>
>
> #include "ima.h"
>
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
> #define IMA_FSMAGIC 0x0004
> #define IMA_UID 0x0008
> #define IMA_FOWNER 0x0010
> +#define IMA_FSUUID 0x0020
>
> #define UNKNOWN 0
> #define MEASURE 0x0001 /* same as IMA_MEASURE */
> @@ -45,6 +47,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
> enum ima_hooks func;
> int mask;
> unsigned long fsmagic;
> + u8 fsuuid[16];
> kuid_t uid;
> kuid_t fowner;
> struct {
> @@ -172,6 +175,9 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
> if ((rule->flags & IMA_FSMAGIC)
> && rule->fsmagic != inode->i_sb->s_magic)
> return false;
> + if ((rule->flags & IMA_FSUUID) &&
> + memcmp(rule->fsuuid, inode->i_sb->s_uuid, sizeof(rule->fsuuid)))
> + return false;
> if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && !uid_eq(rule->uid, cred->uid))
> return false;
> if ((rule->flags & IMA_FOWNER) && !uid_eq(rule->fowner, inode->i_uid))
> @@ -346,7 +352,7 @@ enum {
> Opt_obj_user, Opt_obj_role, Opt_obj_type,
> Opt_subj_user, Opt_subj_role, Opt_subj_type,
> Opt_func, Opt_mask, Opt_fsmagic, Opt_uid, Opt_fowner,
> - Opt_appraise_type
> + Opt_appraise_type, Opt_fsuuid
> };
>
> static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
> @@ -364,6 +370,7 @@ static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
> {Opt_func, "func=%s"},
> {Opt_mask, "mask=%s"},
> {Opt_fsmagic, "fsmagic=%s"},
> + {Opt_fsuuid, "fsuuid=%s"},
> {Opt_uid, "uid=%s"},
> {Opt_fowner, "fowner=%s"},
> {Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
> @@ -519,6 +526,19 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
> if (!result)
> entry->flags |= IMA_FSMAGIC;
> break;
> + case Opt_fsuuid:
> + ima_log_string(ab, "fsuuid", args[0].from);
> +
> + if (memchr_inv(entry->fsuuid, 0x00,
> + sizeof(entry->fsuuid))) {
> + result = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + part_pack_uuid(args[0].from, entry->fsuuid);
> + entry->flags |= IMA_FSUUID;
> + result = 0;
> + break;
> case Opt_uid:
> ima_log_string(ab, "uid", args[0].from);
>

We don't have part_pack_uuid() without CONFIG_BLOCK, so should this return
-ENOTSUPP if that option is not enabled?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/