[PATCH 1/2] memblock: add assertion for zero allocation size

From: Vineet Gupta
Date: Thu Feb 21 2013 - 13:40:18 EST

This came to light when calling memblock allocator from arc port (for
copying flattended DT). If a "0" alignment is passed, the allocator
round_up() call incorrectly rounds up the size to 0.

round_up(num, alignto) => ((num - 1) | (alignto -1)) + 1

While the obvious allocation failure causes kernel to panic, it is
better to BUG_ON() if effective size for allocation (as passed by caller
and/or computed after alignemtn rounding) is zero.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mm/memblock.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 1bcd9b9..32b36d0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -824,6 +824,8 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size,
/* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */
size = round_up(size, align);

+ BUG_ON(!size);
found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, max_addr, size, align, nid);
if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size))
return found;

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/