Re: [resend] Timer broadcast question
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Feb 19 2013 - 13:21:22 EST
On 02/19/2013 07:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> I am working on identifying the different wakeup sources from the
>> interrupts and I have a question regarding the timer broadcast.
>> The broadcast timer is setup to the next event and that will wake up any
>> idle cpu belonging to the "broadcast cpumask", right ?
>> The cpu which has been woken up will look for each cpu the next-event
>> and send an IPI to wake it up.
>> Although, it is possible the sender of this IPI may not be concerned by
>> the timer expiration and has been woken up just for sending the IPI, right ?
>> If this is correct, is it possible to setup the timer irq affinity to a
>> cpu which will be concerned by the timer expiration ? so we prevent an
>> unnecessary wake up for a cpu.
> It is possible, but we never implemented it.
> If we go there, we want to make that conditional on a property flag,
> because some interrupt controllers especially on x86 only allow to
> move the affinity from interrupt context, which is pointless.
Thanks Thomas for your quick answer. I will write a RFC patchset.
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/