Re: [Bisected] 3.7-rc1 can't resume
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Feb 18 2013 - 11:22:47 EST
I might be able to get my hands on a T43 later this week and see if I can reproduce this. This patch seems more plausible, at least... but still puzzling.
Jonas Heinrich <onny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 02-17 21:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Does the commit immediately preceding this one behave correctly?
>Strangely the preceding commit works well, so I bisected the kernel
>again, this time more carefully and I've got a different result!
>(see bisect_log attachement).
>It seems to be commit 73201dbec64aebf6b0dca855b523f437972dc7bb
>Someone on LKML already reported an issue with this commit
>(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/18/228) , but Peter
>Anvins patch got already applied in newer versions.
>Reverting this patch with the recent git clone seems to be difficult
>because it already has too much dependencies.
>Additionally I've included dmesg dumps of the last good and the bad
>On 02-17 12:52, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> T43 is quite old... which might have exposed unique bugs. How
>reliable is the failure? Even one misidentified commit results in git
>bisect giving garbage.
>It affects really all versions after that commit and the failure
>every time I try to resume my notebook.
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/