Stupid user with user-space questions, matrix LED driving withuser space code only.
From: Jonathan Andrews
Date: Sat Feb 16 2013 - 09:50:58 EST
I hope this is the correct place, I expect to get abused.
I'm trying to do a mostly soft real-time task with a very small hard
real time element.
I've written some code to drive matrix LED signs using a Raspberry Pi.
Since I last used linux you kernel people have fiddled with it yet
Linux raspberrypi 3.6.11+ #375 PREEMPT Tue Feb 12 01:41:07 GMT 2013 armv6l GNU/Linux
I'm scanning an LED display to produce a 2 bits per pixel image. The
code simply alters the amount of time any one LED is on, for higher
intensity pixels the true amount of "on" time is non critical.
I've marked my process as realtime.
My problem is that for very dim pixels the amount of "on" time for the
LED is very critical, this is only a fraction of a percent of the total
It scans 100 frames of brightest, 100 frames of brighter and 1 frame of
dim pixels for example, so 200:1 ratio of don't care much /vs care a lot
To this end I'm using a hard coded small delay instead of usleep for the
tight timing section:
// Delay for ARM without yeilding to schedular, roughly calibrated but better than usleep for short delays
inline usleep_arm_hard(int usecs)
long int outer,inner;
asm("andeq r0, r0, r0"); // NOP
The dim pixel code is timing critical (but as I said only a tiny
fraction of the total CPU usage). What I need to do is grab the CPU and
prevent any context switch (IRQ or PREEMPT) for this period.
I cant find a user space mechanism other than changing the kernel to
disable preemtion ? No simple /proc switch to turn it on/off ? If not
why - I cant be the only one who wants to toggle preemption off without
swapping kernels ?
The other issue is that of IRQs, my dim pixels on the display seem to
flash brighter from time to time, this I assume is partly preemption
(maybe possibly) and partly IRQ handling (more likely) allowing context
switches or just taking a while on slow hardware.
I need only a tiny fraction of the runtime to be hard real time, on
intel in the past i've simply disabled IRQs briefly with some inline
The Raspberry Pi board would also probably survive this as the only
active peripheral is ethenet, I suspect couple of missed IRQs would not
matter as once IRQs are re-enabled the USB/ethernet hardware will likely
have the data or it can be re-tried. Does anyone have an example of a
dirty hack along these lines they can share with me :-)
Do I have any simple mechanism available to disable (or defer) kernel
IRQ handling briefly from user space code, I suspect not but no harm in
PS I'm not a kernel hacker - yes I know I could write a proper driver
for the task but I lack any real skill and the required time !
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/