Re: [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Tue Feb 12 2013 - 13:06:30 EST


Il 12/02/2013 18:37, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
> For my education, why remove the FUA stuff?

Because I had no way to test it.

>>> > > Hmmm... the underlying storage could be md/dm RAIDs in which case FUA
>>> > > should be cheaper than FLUSH.
>> >
>> > If someone ever wrote a virtio-blk backend that sits directly ontop
>> > of the Linux block layer that would be true.
> In this case we don't know what the backend is sitting on top of
> a-priori. It might be the current nbd server code, but it might
> not be.

Do you know of any other NBD server than the "official" one and qemu-nbd?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/