Re: [PATCH 01/02] ACPI: sysfs eject support for ACPI scan handlers

[Yasuaki Ishimatsu]

Hi Toshi,

2013/02/07 7:50, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Changed sysfs eject, acpi_eject_store(), to support ACPI scan handlers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/scan.c |    2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index cfd7a69..3ff632e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr,
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   #ifndef FORCE_EJECT

> -	if (acpi_device->driver == NULL) {
> +	if (!acpi_device->driver && !acpi_device->handler) {

I don't understand the fix.

The if sentence becomes true, when both acpi_device->driver and acpi_device->handler
are NULL. It means that acpi_eject_store() runs if either acpi_device->driver or
acpi_device->handler has pointer. Is it O.K.?

I think it should be if (!acpi_device->driver || !acpi_device->handler).

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

>   		ret = -ENODEV;
>   		goto err;
>   	}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/