Re: [PATCH 12/15] sound: add missing HAS_IOPORT and GENERIC_HARDIRQS dependencies

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 07 February 2013 14:32:06 Heiko Carstens wrote:
> 
> That sounds reasonable. And a quick grep seems to indicate that s390
> is the last architecture with !GENERIC_HARDIRQS.
> However having two completely different IRQ subsystems within one
> architecture will bring up some interesting questions like e.g.
> how should /proc/interrupts look like? Or /proc/stat:intr ?

/proc/interrupts can still be managed by architecture code, and
you can put in there whatever makes sense. I would suggest
keeping the current code for it, or adding the GENERIC_HARDIRQ
support at the end of it.

> Jan considered turning GENERIC_HARDIRQS on for PCI support, but didn't.
> I don't know why he didn't and since he left, we can't ask him anymore.

I briefly talked about it with him a couple of months ago, and
he said that the thought Martin would hate it.  I still think
it's the best solution though.

> So for the time being I'd appreciate it if we can simply add the
> additional GENERIC_HARDIRQS dependencies where needed, since I consider
> a working allmodconfig quite important.
>
> Later on we should indeed try to switch to GENERIC_HARDIRQS and then
> git rid of that config option completely. However I leave that to
> Sebastian and Gerald who now take care of our PCI code 

Yes, makes sense.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/