Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next 2/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use the rcu

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Feb 06 2013 - 07:54:18 EST


On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 02:21:11 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 6 February 2013 08:22, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 6 February 2013 07:34, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> In general rwlocks are discourged so we are moving it to use the rcu instead.
> >>
> >> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> >
> > bleeding-edge got updated again and this patch would have conflicts :)
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Rafael,
>
> I have applied them over bleeding-edge after resolving few conflicts.
> Please pick them up from:
>
> Branch: for-rafael
> Repo: git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-rafael

That's really helpful, thanks a lot!

Both applied to bleeding-edge.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/