Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 03:45:58 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 6 February 2013 15:38, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I have pushed the complete patchset here:
> >>
> >> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cpufreq-updates
> >>
> >
> > Viresh, perhaps you should ask Stephen Rothwell to pull in your tree
> > to get some more testing before Rafael pulls it in for 3.10?
> 
> Its has been made clear by Rafael that these patches wouldn't make it for
> 3.9 (though i wanted them to :) ), and so once the merge window is over
> Rafael might pull them in and so they would reach Stephen's linux-next too...
> 
> I am not sure if sending a cpufreq pull request directly to Stephen is
> preferred.
> @Rafael: ??

You may do that, if you want, but that's slightly confusing.

Also the policy is that material which is not going to be included into v3.9
shouldn't be in linux-next before v3.9-rc1.

Moreover, for build testing it is sufficient to put it into a branch somewhere
at git.kernel.org (as you have already noticed :-)).

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/