[PATCH v3 18/23] tty: Remove stale comment re: tty_ldisc_flush_works()

[Peter Hurley]

Waiting for a pending hangup to complete is not a necessary
post-operation of using tty_ldisc_halt() and not sufficient to
guarantee a hangup is not in-progress. As far as the ldisc layer
is concerned, waiting for a pending hangup is necessary only
prior to changing the ldisc while handling the TIOCSETD ioctl (and
only because the tty lock must be released as a precondition
of halting the ldisc).

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 9599b05..f3cbfb3 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -538,10 +538,6 @@ static int tty_ldisc_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty, long timeout)
  *
  *	Callers other than tty_ldisc_release() must hold ->ldisc_mutex and
  *	cannot be holding tty_lock() (aka legacy_mutex).
- *
- *	You need to do a 'flush_scheduled_work()' (outside the ldisc_mutex)
- *	in order to make sure any currently executing ldisc work is also
- *	flushed.
  */
 
 static int tty_ldisc_halt(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *o_tty,
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/