Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection

[Mimi Zohar]

On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:

> It's not clear to me why we need this encapsulation - wouldn't it be
> better to add another [pointer,size] pair to the bootloader protocol
> with a structure like:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/30/68 was in response to the assumption
that the initramfs is measured/appraised.  These patches attempt to
address those concerns.

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/