Re: [PATCH] kdump, oldmem: support mmap on /dev/oldmem

[Vivek Goyal]

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:59:35AM +0000, Hatayama, Daisuke wrote:
> Support mmap() on /dev/oldmem to improve performance of reading
> /proc/vmcore. Currently, read to /proc/vmcore is done by read_oldmem()
> that uses ioremap and iounmap per a single page; for example, if
> memory is 1GB, ioremap/iounmap is called (1GB / 4KB)-times, that is,
> 262144 times. This causes big performance degradation.
> 
> By this patch, we saw improvement on simple benchmark from
> 
>   200 [MiB/sec] to over 100.00 [GiB/sec].

Impressve improvement. Thanks for the patch.

[..]
> For design decision, I didn't support mmap() on /proc/vmcore because
> it abstracts old memory as ELF format, so there's range consequtive on
> /proc/vmcore but not consequtive on the actual old memory. For
> example, consider ELF headers on the 2nd kernel and the note objects,
> memory chunks corresponding to PT_LOAD entries on the first kernel.
> They are not consequtive on the old memory. So reampping them so
> /proc/vmcore appears consequtive using existing remap_pfn_range() needs
> some complicated work.

Can't we call remap_pfn_range() multiple times. Once for each sequential
range of memory. /proc/vmcore already has list of contiguous memory areas.
So we can parse user passed file offset and size and map into respective
physical chunks and call rempa_pfn_range() on all these chunks.

I think supporting mmap() both on /dev/oldmem as well as /proc/vmcore will
be nice.

Agreed that supporting mmap() on /proc/vmcore is more work as compared to
/dev/oldmem but should be doable.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/