Re: [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool

[Lai Jiangshan]

ä 2013/2/5 5:28, Tejun Heo åé:
> Hello, again.
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:41:26AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct delayed_work {
>>   	struct work_struct work;
>>   	struct timer_list timer;
>>   	int cpu;
>> +	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>
> Can't we just replace delayed_work->cpu with delayed_work->cwq?  That
> way, we don't enlarge delayed_work while encoding both wq and cpu in
> delayed_work proper.
>
> Thanks.
>

The @cpu can be WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, and the current code will delay
to determine on which cpu should this work be queued until timeout,
I didn't want to change this behavior when I.

queue_delayed_work_on(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, system_wq, dwork, delay);

But there is no "get_cwq(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, system_wq)".
So we have to record the @wq to dwork, Or determine the cpu to queue
earlier which changes the current behavior. I'm OK with this change.

Thanks,
Lai

PS, again, @cpu and @wq can be saved in dwork.work.entry if needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/