RE: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

[Nathan Zimmer]

Ok, I'll rebase and retest from linux-next then.


________________________________________
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [rjw@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:13 AM
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Nathan Zimmer; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shawn Guo; linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 03:28:30 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I actually don't agree with that, becuase the Nathan's apprach shows the
> > reasoning that leads to the RCU introduction quite clearly.  So if you
> > don't have technical problems with the patchset, I'm going to take it as is.
>
> Great!!
>
> Okay.. I don't have any technical problems with it, i reviewed most of it
> carefully. The only pending thing is rebase on linux-next, after that i can
> give my ack for it.

Yes, it would be great if it were rebased and retested.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/