Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

[Viresh Kumar]

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I actually don't agree with that, becuase the Nathan's apprach shows the
> reasoning that leads to the RCU introduction quite clearly.  So if you
> don't have technical problems with the patchset, I'm going to take it as is.

Great!!

Okay.. I don't have any technical problems with it, i reviewed most of it
carefully. The only pending thing is rebase on linux-next, after that i can
give my ack for it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/